SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
The effect of exogenous ketone bodies on cognition across health and disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive function is closely linked to brain energy metabolism and may be compromised by aging, metabolic stress, and neuropsychiatric disease. Ketone bodies can serve as an alternative cerebral fuel and may also exert signaling effects relevant to cognition. Exogenous ketones (EK) offer a practical means of increasing circulating ketone concentrations without dietary carbohydrate restriction. However, the overall effect of EK supplementation on cognitive performance in humans has not been systematically quantified. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched through October 2025 for randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of EK on cognitive outcomes in healthy adults or individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using the PEDro scale. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses examined the influence of ketone formulation, intervention duration, dose, population type, and presence of acute cognitive stressors. Results: 38 studies comprising 41 protocols (1,602 participants) were included in the systematic review, with 29 protocols (1,117 participants) eligible for meta-analysis. EK supplementation was associated with a statistically significant improvement in cognitive performance compared with placebo (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.41; Discussion: EK supplementation is associated with modest improvements in cognitive performance across diverse populations and study designs. These findings support EK as a flexible nutritional strategy for cognitive support and warrant further investigation in well-powered, long-term trials to clarify optimal dosing, formulation, and clinical applicability. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023471727, CRD42023471727.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.