ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
Deliberate Practice in Point-of-care Ultrasound Interpretation of Hydronephrosis.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become increasingly utilized as an important tool in acute care settings. Deliberate practice as part of POCUS training has previously been shown to enhance learner performance in image interpretation, though its efficacy in residents' identification of hydronephrosis with renal POCUS has not been well-studied. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the learning curve for internal medicine residents using deliberate practice for the identification of hydronephrosis on renal POCUS interpretation. Methods: We recruited internal medicine residents from Mount Sinai Beth Israel and Mount Sinai Morningside/West, and asked them to complete a 30-case educational instrument on the interpretation of hydronephrosis. The study was conducted as a series of two separate hour-long sessions and included residents with varying baseline POCUS experience. We mapped cumulative accuracy as learning curves to assess resident performance. Results: A total of 47 participants completed the survey and deliberate practice instrument and demonstrated significant improvement in confidence level and image interpretation skills. All learners demonstrated improvement in accuracy with repetitive practice. We mapped the learning curve and found a plateau in accuracy at 20-25 cases. Statistical analysis of the results was performed with Microsoft Excel Version 16.85, and R version 4.3.2. Conclusion: Deliberate practice in the identification of hydronephrosis on renal POCUS using a novel case-based instrument improves residents' accuracy. This approach is easily reproducible, can impact learners at different stages of experience, and can be integrated into a more comprehensive curriculum on POCUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.