Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063921›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound

The Role of Contrast-to-noise Ratio in Assessing the Quality of Obstetric Ultrasound: Subjective Approach and the Influence of Maternal and Obstetric Factors.

Rym Oudghiri Idrissi, Iglika Ivancheva Simeonova-Brachot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rym Oudghiri IdrissiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Iglika Ivancheva Simeonova-BrachotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare sonographer assessment of scan quality using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for obstetric ultrasound images to identify the maternal and obstetric factors that could affect scan quality. Methods: This retrospective study included 187 consecutive ultrasound scans at 18 weeks of gestation, 205 fetuses, and 565 ultrasound images. Ultrasound scans were performed by a single operator using a General Electric ultrasound machine and a 2-7-MHz RM6C convex probe with the same ultrasound settings. Two independent, blinded sonographers rated the contrast and noise of the abdominal perimeter, four-chamber, and sagittal spine views on a scale of 1-3. The sonographer scores were categorized as poor, fair, good, or excellent, respectively. Patient scans were considered unsatisfactory if they had at least one poor CNR; good if they had more than three CNRs classified as good or excellent; and acceptable otherwise. Results: Interobserver agreement for CNR was moderate to good with 0.53< intraclass correlation coefficient 0.68; Conclusion: We demonstrated good interoperator reproducibility of CNR. Maternal obesity was the main factor affecting fetal ultrasound quality.

Indexed as

Contrast-to-noise ratioimage qualityinterobserver agreementobesityobstetrical ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42063921
PMCPMC13128071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.