ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
The Role of Contrast-to-noise Ratio in Assessing the Quality of Obstetric Ultrasound: Subjective Approach and the Influence of Maternal and Obstetric Factors.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal Ultrasound Evaluation of Congenital Hand Anomalies: Toward a Standardized Approach.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare sonographer assessment of scan quality using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for obstetric ultrasound images to identify the maternal and obstetric factors that could affect scan quality. Methods: This retrospective study included 187 consecutive ultrasound scans at 18 weeks of gestation, 205 fetuses, and 565 ultrasound images. Ultrasound scans were performed by a single operator using a General Electric ultrasound machine and a 2-7-MHz RM6C convex probe with the same ultrasound settings. Two independent, blinded sonographers rated the contrast and noise of the abdominal perimeter, four-chamber, and sagittal spine views on a scale of 1-3. The sonographer scores were categorized as poor, fair, good, or excellent, respectively. Patient scans were considered unsatisfactory if they had at least one poor CNR; good if they had more than three CNRs classified as good or excellent; and acceptable otherwise. Results: Interobserver agreement for CNR was moderate to good with 0.53< intraclass correlation coefficient 0.68; Conclusion: We demonstrated good interoperator reproducibility of CNR. Maternal obesity was the main factor affecting fetal ultrasound quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.