Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063905›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2026

Medication errors among elderly in-patients at an urban national referral hospital in Tanzania: Prevalence and patient profiles in a low-resource setting.

Anita Kaligirwa, Emanuel L Peter, Paul E Alele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anita KaligirwaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Emanuel L PeterTraditional Medicine Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Mabibo, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Paul E AleleDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prescribing processes for the elderly are complex and challenging due to advanced age-related physiologic changes, co-morbidities, and co-medications which increase the chances of medication errors. There are, however, limited studies on the magnitude and profiles of medication errors among elderly populations in low-resource settings such as Tanzania. Objective: To determine the prevalence and profiles of medication errors among elderly in-patients at Mwananyamala Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) in Dar-es-Salaam in Tanzania. Method: Medical data were analyzed of patients aged 65 years and above who were admitted to MRRH between March 2019 and February 2020 for any type of illness. Medication errors were systematically assessed using STOPP/START criteria. Results: Of 298 patients' records analyzed, the majority were females (n=151, 50.7%). Each patient had at least 2 diseases with an average of 5 types of medicines per patient. Twenty-eight patients (9.40%) had at least one error while the majority (n=270, 90.60%) had no medication errors. Medication omission accounted for the majority of errors present (86, 28.86%). Conclusion: Medication errors were prevalent among elderly patients admitted at MRRH, with diverse profiles related to the errors. Further studies are warranted to devise and adopt strategies to mitigate medication errors in this population.

Indexed as

InpatientsMedication ErrorsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceReferral and ConsultationResource-Limited SettingsTanzaniaElderlyErrorsIn-patientsMedicationTanzania

Identifiers

PMID42063905
PMCPMC13126145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.