ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The impact of AI precision feedback on college students' thinking shaping ability: mediating effect of intrinsic value identification and moderating role of critical consciousness transformation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the context of educational digital transformation, AI precision feedback has emerged as a critical technological support for optimizing college students' cognitive development. As a key dimension of core competencies, thinking shaping ability directly impacts academic progress and lifelong learning capabilities. Methods: To elucidate the mechanism of AI precision feedback in shaping students' thinking shaping ability, this study conducted a mediation analysis with 1,079 college students using path analysis, Bootstrap sampling, and moderation testing. The research constructed a mediation model: "AI precision feedback → intrinsic value identification → thinking shaping ability," incorporating critical consciousness transformation as a moderating variable. Results: Results revealed: (1) AI precision feedback significantly enhances thinking shaping ability (standardized coefficient = 0.561, Conclusion: This study enriches the theoretical framework for AI education and cognitive cultivation, providing empirical evidence and practical guidance for universities to optimize AI technology applications and precisely enhance students' cognitive literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.