Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063841›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2026

Harnessing Membrane-Active Peptides for Selective Cancer Targeting: Phosphatidylserine Recognition by Tilapia Piscidin 4.

Wright K Makambi, Soumita De, Dandan Li, Kinjal Mondal, Megan E Mitchell, Navleen Kaur, Erik Watkins, Frank Heinrich, David P Hoogerheide, Jeffery B Klauda and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wright K MakambiInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Soumita DeNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-0317
Dandan LiNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.
Kinjal MondalUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.
Megan E MitchellUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-0562
Navleen KaurInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Erik WatkinsOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States.
Frank HeinrichNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
David P HoogerheideNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-1469
Jeffery B KlaudaUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-1870
Udo RudloffNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.
Myriam L CottenOregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Mihaela MihailescuInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-5655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane-active peptides (MAPs) have garnered significant attention as potential alternatives to conventional cancer therapies, which are frequently limited by severe side effects. Among them, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that leverage differences between the plasma membranes of cancer cells and healthy cells are particularly attractive. While several AMPs have demonstrated anticancer potency, structure-function relationship studies are lacking to explain the molecular basis of their selectivity and to help design improved analogs. Here, we contribute to filling this gap by investigating Nile tilapia piscidin 4 (TP4), an AMP with demonstrated activity against several solid organ cancers. First, we discover through biological assays that the anticancer activity of the peptide, which underscores a promising therapeutic window, is associated with increased plasma membrane permeability in cancer cells compared to normal cells and positively (negatively) correlated with enzymes that enrich (deplete) anionic PS in the outer leaflet. Next, we utilize a suite of complementary techniques on model membranes to investigate the interactions of TP4 with membranes, uncovering behaviors not previously observed in related AMPs. Circular dichroism experiments reveal that TP4 preferentially binds to zwitterionic phosphatidylcholine (PC) membranes enriched in anionic PS, while cholesterol markedly impairs binding. X-ray diffraction demonstrates that TP4 disrupts PC-PS membranes by inducing lipid segregation. Covering a range of biologically relevant peptide concentrations with neutron diffraction and reflectometry measurements in fluid bilayers and MD simulations, we unveil how TP4 and associated water gradually insert into the hydrocarbon region and cause convoluted membrane deformations to breach the membrane barriers. These studies highlight the pivotal role of the TP4 polyarginine tail in driving selective membrane binding and disruption on membranes enriched with the anionic lipid PS. Together, our results elucidate the molecular determinants underpinning the selective anticancer effects of TP4, providing a strategic framework for the rational design of advanced membrane-active therapeutics.

Indexed as

anticancer peptidesantimicrobial peptides (AMPs)biophysical characterizationcancer cellslipid bilayersmembrane-active peptidesmembrane asymmetrymolecular dynamics simulationsneutron diffractionneutron reflectometrypiscidinstilapia piscidin 4 (TP4)X-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID42063841
PMCPMC13126172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.