ArticleJACS Au2026
Harnessing Membrane-Active Peptides for Selective Cancer Targeting: Phosphatidylserine Recognition by Tilapia Piscidin 4.
Article in JACS Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane-active peptides (MAPs) have garnered significant attention as potential alternatives to conventional cancer therapies, which are frequently limited by severe side effects. Among them, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that leverage differences between the plasma membranes of cancer cells and healthy cells are particularly attractive. While several AMPs have demonstrated anticancer potency, structure-function relationship studies are lacking to explain the molecular basis of their selectivity and to help design improved analogs. Here, we contribute to filling this gap by investigating Nile tilapia piscidin 4 (TP4), an AMP with demonstrated activity against several solid organ cancers. First, we discover through biological assays that the anticancer activity of the peptide, which underscores a promising therapeutic window, is associated with increased plasma membrane permeability in cancer cells compared to normal cells and positively (negatively) correlated with enzymes that enrich (deplete) anionic PS in the outer leaflet. Next, we utilize a suite of complementary techniques on model membranes to investigate the interactions of TP4 with membranes, uncovering behaviors not previously observed in related AMPs. Circular dichroism experiments reveal that TP4 preferentially binds to zwitterionic phosphatidylcholine (PC) membranes enriched in anionic PS, while cholesterol markedly impairs binding. X-ray diffraction demonstrates that TP4 disrupts PC-PS membranes by inducing lipid segregation. Covering a range of biologically relevant peptide concentrations with neutron diffraction and reflectometry measurements in fluid bilayers and MD simulations, we unveil how TP4 and associated water gradually insert into the hydrocarbon region and cause convoluted membrane deformations to breach the membrane barriers. These studies highlight the pivotal role of the TP4 polyarginine tail in driving selective membrane binding and disruption on membranes enriched with the anionic lipid PS. Together, our results elucidate the molecular determinants underpinning the selective anticancer effects of TP4, providing a strategic framework for the rational design of advanced membrane-active therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.