ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Laparoscopic lateral suspension combined with uterosacral ligament suspension for advanced apical pelvic organ prolapse: preliminary outcomes of a retrospective series.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) is a novel technique for repairing anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, the efficacy is limited for advanced apical defects, particularly when combined with posterior compartment prolapse. This preliminary study evaluated the short-term outcomes of mesh-based LLS combined with uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) for treating advanced apical prolapse with involvement of both the anterior and posterior compartments. Methods: Between January 2022 and June 2024, 28 women with apical POP ≥ stage III underwent mesh-based LLS with USLS. Titanized polypropylene mesh was placed on the vesicovaginal fascia, and the posterior compartment defects were addressed with USLS. All patients preserved their uterus. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the gynecological examination and the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Objective anatomic success was defined as POP-Q stage <II at all points at 12-month follow-up. Subjective outcomes were measured with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire. Results: The mean age of participants was 57.71 ± 10.36 years, with a mean BMI of 25.48 ± 2.87 kg/m Conclusion: Combining LLS with USLS is a safe and potentially effective treatment for advanced, multi-compartment apical prolapse in this preliminary cohort. While short-term outcomes are encouraging, the lack of a control group and the potential confounding effect of distal vaginal repair necessitate larger studies to confirm long-term durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.