Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063786›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Beyond silos: transdisciplinary collaboration for allied health clinicians providing stroke primary care.

Aleysha K Martin, Kerrie Evans, E-Liisa Laakso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleysha K MartinAllied Health, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kerrie Evans *Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
E-Liisa Laakso *Allied Health, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating healthcare through team collaboration has many benefits, including more efficient, cost-effective services and improved client outcomes. However, in primary care, allied health professionals treating people with stroke often work in parallel, discipline-specific silos, which limits communication and leads to fragmented and/or duplicated care. Strengthening patient care after stroke requires moving beyond multidisciplinary collaboration toward transdisciplinary collaboration. Transdisciplinary collaboration is a form of skill-sharing, where one professional completes additional competency training to safely work beyond their usual scope of practice. In this perspectives paper, we present the view that transdisciplinary allied health collaboration has a role in primary care, using stroke as our case example. We explore the potential benefits and feasibility of transdisciplinary collaboration and provide clinical examples and insights to illustrate the concepts. We propose five considerations when embarking on transdisciplinary collaboration: (1) healthcare settings and jurisdiction, (2) consumer needs, (3) workforce availability, (4) clinician attributes and skills, and (5) team collaboration rules. This paper challenges allied health professionals, leaders and managers working in primary care, as well as policy makers, to review current practice and explore avenues for transdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

integrated careinterprofessionalmodels of caremultidisciplinaryscope of practice

Identifiers

PMID42063786
PMCPMC13124537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.