ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Selective drainage and rectal misoprostol after laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of pelvic drainage and postoperative rectal misoprostol on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy. Design: Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: Five tertiary hospitals in Sichuan Province, China, between January 2021 and June 2025. Patients: Of 302 patients initially identified, 280 met inclusion criteria after exclusions for malignancy, incomplete data, or combined procedures. Interventions: Patients were categorized into four groups according to surgical approach (multi-port vs. single-port) and postoperative management strategy, allowing evaluation of the independent effects of pelvic drainage and misoprostol within different surgical contexts. The use of pelvic drainage and rectal misoprostol (400 μg) was non-randomized and determined by institutional protocol and surgeon discretion. Perioperative parameters-including operative time, blood loss, drainage characteristics, and postoperative recovery-were extracted from electronic medical records. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were postoperative fever and pelvic infection; secondary outcomes included drainage output and duration, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay. Results: Pelvic drainage did not reduce postoperative fever or pelvic infection. In multivariable logistic regression adjusted for relevant covariates (including age, BMI, parity, prior abdominal surgery, myoma size, number of myomas removed, and use of vasopressin or other hemostatic agents), drain placement independently increased the risk of postoperative fever (adjusted OR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.10-4.82, Conclusion: Pelvic drainage after laparoscopic myomectomy offers no measurable benefit and may heighten postoperative morbidity. In contrast, adjunctive rectal misoprostol effectively lowers the incidence of postoperative fever and pelvic infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.