ArticleJPRAS open2026
SCULPT: Medical student and resident doctor comprehension, uptake of learning and perception of aesthetic surgery and training.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As demand for aesthetic procedures continues to grow in the UK, alongside presentations of aesthetic-related complications, understanding current training provision and clinician preparedness is essential to inform educational curriculum development and regulatory policy. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted across UK medical schools and postgraduate medical education regions to evaluate UK medical students' and resident doctors' exposure to, knowledge of, and perceptions of aesthetic practice. Results: A total of 2369 participants completed the survey (1757 students; 612 residents). Formal aesthetic teaching was uncommon: 10.9% of students ( Conclusion: These findings provide an evidence base for developing structured aesthetic curricula and strengthening regulatory frameworks to better prepare clinicians for this expanding area of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.