ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Spatial AI in cancer: mapping immune evasion topology through multi-modal omics and deep learning.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering immunosuppressive niches by spatial single-cell proteomics: spatial interaction networks and translational opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed cancer therapy, achieving lasting responses in some patients, yet most still encounter primary or acquired resistance. Recent evidence demonstrates that this resistance is driven not only by intrinsic cellular features but also by the spatial organization of the tumor microenvironment (TME), including physical barriers, localized immunosuppressive niches, and organized immune cell aggregates that collectively regulate anti-tumor immunity. This review synthesizes advances in Spatial AI, combining high-resolution spatial multi-omics with deep learning approaches, particularly graph neural networks (GNNs), to elucidate the topological mechanisms of immune evasion and inform therapeutic development. Technological platforms enabling spatial molecular mapping, tools for multi-modal alignment and normalization, and computational frameworks for graph-based TME representation are covered. We define spatial phenotypes associated with immune resistance, such as immune exclusion, dysfunctional inflamed regions, and maturation states of tertiary lymphoid structures, and demonstrate how Spatial AI generates interpretable topological biomarkers that surpass conventional assays. The discussion addresses translational pathways for spatial biomarker validation and highlights key obstacles, including data standardization, computational scalability, explainability, and regulatory approval. Ultimately, immune evasion is a topological challenge, and Spatial AI offers a robust computational solution to translate complex spatial data into actionable clinical strategies to overcome architectural resistance in cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.