ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting symptomatic pelvic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model using retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and laboratory data from patients with cervical cancer to predict symptomatic pelvic lymphocele (SPL) following pelvic lymphadenectomy. Methods: Clinical data were collected from 221 patients with cervical cancer who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College between January 2023 and September 2024. SPL occurred in 44 patients, whereas 177 had asymptomatic lymphoceles or no lymphocele. Univariate analysis identified risk factors for SPL. Four predictive models including Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were developed. Model performance was assessed using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and Brier Score. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to determine feature importance. Results: The incidence of SPL among patients with cervical cancer was 19.9%. Among the four models, the KNN model demonstrated relatively better predictive performance in both the training and test sets (training set AUC = 0.952, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.924-0.980; test set AUC = 0.832, 95% CI 0.692-0.972; Brier Score = 0.118). DCA indicated favorable clinical utility for the KNN model. SHAP analysis identified the most predictive features for SPL as diabetes, surgical approach, preoperative monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, preoperative fibrinogen level, and tumor size. Conclusion: This interpretable model identified key features associated with SPL following pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer, yielding preliminary insights that support hypothesis generation for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.