ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026
The role of metabolomics in enhancing diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, relapsing condition associated with diagnostic delays, disease misclassification, and variable treatment response. Conventional diagnostic and monitoring tools remain limited in capturing the biological complexity of IBD, prompting growing interest in metabolomics as a complementary approach. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to examine the role of metabolomics in enhancing the diagnosis and management of IBD across adult and pediatric populations. Design: Systematic review. Data sources and methods: The review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to identify eligible studies. Observational studies and clinical trials assessing metabolomics in IBD diagnosis or management were included. Methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, RoB 2, and ROBINS-I. Due to substantial heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. Results: Fourteen studies involving approximately 3700 participants met the inclusion criteria. Metabolomic analyses of serum, feces, urine, and plasma consistently identified disease-associated metabolic perturbations, particularly in amino acids, bile acids, lipids, and short-chain fatty acids. Only two studies reported formal diagnostic performance, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80% for distinguishing IBD subtypes. Several studies demonstrated metabolomic changes associated with treatment response and remission; however, outcome definitions varied widely across studies. Conclusion: Metabolomics shows significant potential to enhance IBD diagnosis and management, particularly for disease differentiation and treatment monitoring. Nonetheless, clinical translation is constrained by methodological heterogeneity and limited diagnostic validation. Future research should prioritize standardized protocols and robust diagnostic accuracy studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.