ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Peak aortic jet velocity as a predictor of short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and aortic valve stenosis (AS) often coexist, with AS exacerbating myocardial ischemia and affecting prognosis. Aims: To investigate the prognostic impact of AS stratified by peak aortic jet velocity (AV-Vel) in patients undergoing PCI. Methods and results: We conducted retrospective multicenter observational study involving patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between April 2013 and March 2019. The patients were divided into non-AS group and AS group. The AS group was further categorized: 2.6 ≤ AV-Vel < 3.0 m/s, mild AS; 3.0 ≤ AV-Vel < 4.0 m/s, moderate AS; and AV-Vel ≥ 4.0 m/s, severe AS. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed over 5-year observation period, with landmark analyses conducted at 30 days after PCI and from day 31 after PCI to 5 years. In total, 9,690 patients were analyzed (AS group, n = 361). Over a median follow-up of 2.57 (IQR: 0.89-4.24) years, AS group exhibited higher rates of mortality (HR: 3.06; 95% CI: 2.41-3.90; p < 0.001) and MACE (HR: 2.45; 95%CI: 1.97-3.04; p < 0.001) compared with non-AS group. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with moderate and severe AS had worse short-term mortality and MACE within 30 days after PCI than the non-AS group, while patients with mild to severe AS showed significantly worse long-term outcomes than the non-AS group. Conclusions: AV-Vel is independently associated with both short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.