ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Evidence of Pervasive Legacy of Land Use Change on Dung Beetles in Central European Grazed Grasslands.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence of Pervasive Legacy of Land Use Change on Dung Beetles in Central European Grazed Grasslands.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last century, intensification and conversion of land use has caused habitat destruction and species extinctions throughout Europe. However, these extinctions can be delayed by time lag effects, i.e., extinction debts, which are typically measured by species richness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether such extinction debts can be detected in dung beetles of the Pannonian region of Austria and the Czech Republic, where extensive pasture systems were converted into intensive agricultural areas. We modeled the impact of this land use change and the use of anthelmintics as an additional stressor on both dung beetle species richness and individual abundance. We found that the use of veterinary anthelmintics significantly reduces dung beetle species richness and that historic land cover data from the 19th century best explained not only current dung beetle species richness, but showed even stronger effects on individual abundance. This suggest that population declines may precede species extinctions, potentially masking the true extent of biodiversity loss in short-term studies. Biodiversity assessments using only species richness may therefore underestimate ongoing species losses, as they don't account for temporal trends in population size. Our findings further underscore the necessity of incorporating historical land-use data when assessing biodiversity trends and conservation strategies, as well as the need for long-term ecological monitoring to capture delayed responses to environmental change. Moreover, the observed impact of anthelmintics on dung beetle communities calls for reconsideration of veterinary practices to mitigate their unintended consequences on biodiversity. Overall, the results add a crucial temporal dimension to understanding insect declines, reinforcing that past land-use decisions shape present and future biodiversity in complex and often underestimated ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.