Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063618›Full record

ArticleMDM policy & practice

Crisis Preparedness by Simulating Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Loss in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease due to Kidney Transplantation Suspensions.

Vincent Bonnemains, Florent Le Borgne, Etienne Dantan, Myriam Pastural, Magali Giral, Cécile Couchoud, Yohann Foucher

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vincent BonnemainsINSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Université de Nantes, Université de Tours, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1654-2253
Florent Le BorgneData Factory & Analytics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, F-44805 Nantes-Angers, France.
Etienne DantanINSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Université de Nantes, Université de Tours, Nantes, France.
Myriam PasturalAgence de la biomédecine, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.
Magali GiralCRTI UMR 1064, INSERM, Université de Nantes; ITUN, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes; Nantes, France.
Cécile CouchoudAgence de la biomédecine, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.
Yohann FoucherINSERM, CIC-1402, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highlights: Our results provide arguments supporting the decision of suspending kidney transplantation activity in case of future crises, provided that the moratorium duration does not exceed a few months.We report that patients active on the waitlist at the beginning of the moratorium lose the most quality-adjusted life-years due to the suspension, particularly candidates younger than 60 y. Hence, if another crisis occurs with the possibility of maintaining only small kidney transplantation activity, giving priority to younger patients active on the list may be justified.Considering quality-adjusted life-years rather than raw survival time results in a more complete assessment of the effect of suspending kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease by taking their quality of life into account.

Indexed as

Crisis preparednessKidney transplantationLife expectancyMoratoriumQuality-adjusted life yearsQuality of lifeSimulation study

Identifiers

PMID42063618
PMCPMC13125785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.