Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063605›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2026

Explaining transformer-based classification of radiology reports.

Megan Courtman, Galaleldin Abdelhalim, Lingfen Sun, Emmanuel Ifeachor, Stephen Mullin, Mark Thurston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan CourtmanPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-7798
Galaleldin AbdelhalimDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8DH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-7718
Lingfen SunSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-2817
Emmanuel IfeachorSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-6292
Stephen MullinPlymouth Institute of Health and Care Research, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-394X
Mark ThurstonDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8DH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-4033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Deep learning models developed for the classification of radiological reports have lacked explainability. We aimed to validate and explain a pretrained classification model by applying it to the removal of confounding data from a radiological dataset. Methods: Two radiologists categorized 2038 anonymized MRI head free-text radiology reports for abnormality and for small vessel disease presence. Of these reports, 80% ( Results: The models exhibited excellent classification performance, with a mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 for abnormality classification and 0.99 for small vessel disease classification. SHAP highlighted relevant words in both cases. Conclusions: This application validated the use of a pretrained transformer in detecting confounding data in research cohorts, and exhibited explainable results that allow the models' decisions to be understood. By highlighting the specific report terms that drive each prediction, the explainable model output can be reviewed and critiqued by subject matter experts, supporting trust, error analysis, and iterative refinement of AI tools within clinical workflows. Advances in knowledge: This application demonstrates the feasibility of explainable report classification, and the fine-tuned model could be used in future for automatic removal of confounding data from radiology datasets, while providing transparent, case-level justifications that support audit, governance, and clinician acceptance.

Indexed as

deep learningexplainable AInatural language processingradiological reportingsmall vessel diseasetransformers

Identifiers

PMID42063605
PMCPMC13045515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.