Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063603›Full record

ReviewBJR artificial intelligence2026

Recent advances in artificial intelligence for radiology report generation: a brief review.

Caitlyn Tran, Basudha Pal, Thomas Stirrat, Victoria Shi, Muhammad Umair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caitlyn TranGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-8938
Basudha PalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Thomas StirratGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7259-9632
Victoria ShiRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Muhammad UmairDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer significant potential to address the growing bottleneck in radiology caused by an increasing volume of imaging studies amidst a global shortage of radiology professionals. This study presents a comprehensive review of the latest developments in AI, particularly in vision-language models for radiology report generation, providing radiologists with a current reference. We conducted a focused literature search for studies published from 2020 to 2024 and included 14 studies in our review specifically on chest X-ray datasets with limited coverage of 3D modalities, reflecting the early stage of research and ongoing methodological advances in report generation for volumetric imaging. We analysed the model architectures, report generation capabilities, training datasets, evaluation metrics, and performance of these models. Our review highlights the evolution of AI in radiology report generation and underscores the critical need for diverse datasets and standardized evaluation metrics. Despite rapid progress, current AI models are not yet capable of consistently producing high-quality reports and require further improvements in data diversity, model training, and evaluation metrics to achieve a level comparable to human experts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical AIdeep learningdiagnostic accuracymedical imagingnatural language processingradiology automationradiology report generationradiology workflowsvision-language models

Identifiers

PMID42063603
PMCPMC13045517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.