Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063598›Full record

ReviewBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2026

A neuroimmune framework for understanding adolescent stress and risk of alcohol misuse.

Léa Aeschlimann, Narimane Bouzourène, Clara Rossetti, Benjamin Boutrel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Léa AeschlimannCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Narimane BouzourèneCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clara RossettiCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benjamin BoutrelCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) represents a critical public health challenge, with early-life adversity conferring heightened risk for compulsive drinking patterns. Alcohol has long been known to exert direct effects on developing neurotransmitter systems, targeting among others GABAergic, glutamatergic, and dopaminergic signaling. Recent evidence however indicates that early adversity also primes microglial activation and establishes chronic low-grade neuroinflammation, disrupting maturation of prefrontal-limbic-striatal circuits governing executive control and affect regulation. Hence, alcohol use may emerge in adolescents as a maladaptive coping mechanism, transiently alleviating stress-related dysphoria while exacerbating neuroimmune and neurocircuit dysfunction. While traditional neurocentric models convincingly depict how repeated withdrawal episodes may unmask this underlying vulnerability, precipitating relapse cycles that consolidate compulsive use, they inadequately explain the persistence and treatment resistance characteristic of adolescent-onset alcohol misuse because they fail to account for the peripheral biological systems that amplify central vulnerability. The gut-microbiota-brain axis represents one such amplifier: stress- and alcohol-related perturbations in barrier integrity and immunometabolic signaling increase peripheral inflammatory load reaching the brain, intensifying neuroimmune tuning of still-maturing control circuits. Integrating these central and peripheral processes reframes adolescent alcohol vulnerability as a systems-level phenomenon embedded within developmental and inflammatory biology, rather than a disorder of reward circuitry alone. This developmental framework suggests that adjunctive therapeutic strategies combining targeted neuroimmune modulation, behavioral intervention, and ecological stabilization during critical developmental windows may offer superior outcomes over conventional reward-focused pharmacotherapies. Realizing this potential will require biomarker-driven risk stratification, precision medicine approaches, and careful developmental consideration of intervention timing

Indexed as

Addiction vulnerabilityAdolescenceAlcohol use disorderGut-microbiota-brain axisHPA axisMicrogliaNeuroinflammationStress

Identifiers

PMID42063598
PMCPMC13125910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.