ArticleGenetics in medicine open2026
Reclassification of missense variant pathogenicity using ClinGen recommendations for recalibrated PP3/BP4 in silico predictor score thresholds.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the effect of ClinGen-calibrated variant effect predictor (VEP) score thresholds on clinically-reported missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) reclassification using 2015 American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology variant classification guidelines. Methods: Missense VUS were reported from clinically indicated genome-wide sequencing or targeted multigene panel testing. Variants were reclassified after integrating select recalibrated VEP pathogenicity scores within the existing 2015 American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. VEPs include VARITY, AlphaMissense, ESM1b, BayesDel, VEST4, REVEL, PolyPhen-2, and SIFT. Results: Overall median percentage of reclassified missense VUS was 5%. VARITY demonstrated the highest median percent reclassification of missense VUS at approximately 7%. VUS reclassifications from 7 of 8 VEPs demonstrated complete agreement when compared with VUS reclassifications from all other VEPs, except for VARITY which demonstrated a mean percentage agreement of 91%. ESM1b and SIFT demonstrated significantly higher proportions of VUS reclassifications to likely benign compared with likely pathogenic. There was no association between VUS reclassification and autosomal mode of inheritance; however, SIFT and VEST4 demonstrated significantly higher reclassifications of VUS from autosomal dominant genes versus autosomal recessive genes. Conclusion: Recalibrated VEP pathogenicity score thresholds modestly affect missense VUS reclassification. The included VEPs largely demonstrated equal VUS reclassifications to likely pathogenic or likely benign with near complete agreement in VUS reclassification between the included VEPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.