Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063570›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine open2026

Reclassification of missense variant pathogenicity using ClinGen recommendations for recalibrated PP3/BP4 in silico predictor score thresholds.

Joseph B Dubé, Sean Kim, Lynette Lau, Ted Higginbotham, Christian R Marshall, Rebekah K Jobling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph B DubéDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sean KimDivision of Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lynette LauDivision of Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ted HigginbothamDivision of Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christian R MarshallDivision of Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rebekah K JoblingDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the effect of ClinGen-calibrated variant effect predictor (VEP) score thresholds on clinically-reported missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) reclassification using 2015 American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology variant classification guidelines. Methods: Missense VUS were reported from clinically indicated genome-wide sequencing or targeted multigene panel testing. Variants were reclassified after integrating select recalibrated VEP pathogenicity scores within the existing 2015 American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. VEPs include VARITY, AlphaMissense, ESM1b, BayesDel, VEST4, REVEL, PolyPhen-2, and SIFT. Results: Overall median percentage of reclassified missense VUS was 5%. VARITY demonstrated the highest median percent reclassification of missense VUS at approximately 7%. VUS reclassifications from 7 of 8 VEPs demonstrated complete agreement when compared with VUS reclassifications from all other VEPs, except for VARITY which demonstrated a mean percentage agreement of 91%. ESM1b and SIFT demonstrated significantly higher proportions of VUS reclassifications to likely benign compared with likely pathogenic. There was no association between VUS reclassification and autosomal mode of inheritance; however, SIFT and VEST4 demonstrated significantly higher reclassifications of VUS from autosomal dominant genes versus autosomal recessive genes. Conclusion: Recalibrated VEP pathogenicity score thresholds modestly affect missense VUS reclassification. The included VEPs largely demonstrated equal VUS reclassifications to likely pathogenic or likely benign with near complete agreement in VUS reclassification between the included VEPs.

Indexed as

ACMG/AMP recommendationsClinGenPP3/BP4 criteriaVariant effect predictorVariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID42063570
PMCPMC13125162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.