ArticleiScience2026
Intelligent classification of dominant tree species in urban forests based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing images.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban tree species classification is essential for green space management but is challenged by the fragmented spatial distributions of trees. To address this issue, this study employs a hyperspectral imagery-based classification method to improve the accuracy of urban forest identification. By leveraging the red-edge spectral reflectance characteristics and optimizing band combinations, this study constructs an optimized vegetation index, NDVI (680, 748), which significantly enhances vegetation extraction in urban environments, achieving an overall accuracy of 97.82% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.95. Using this index, recursive feature elimination with cross-validation was applied to select highly discriminative features, which were then integrated into multiple machine learning models. Among these, the random forest model-incorporating characteristic bands, textural features, and vegetation indices-achieved the best test set performance, with an overall accuracy of 86.91% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.85. This method enables high-precision urban forest mapping, facilitating sustainable ecosystem management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.