Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063533›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026

Theoretical Prediction of Bias in Model-Based Material Decomposition.

Donghyeon Lee, Xiao Jiang, J Webster Stayman, Grace J Gang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donghyeon LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
Xiao JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A.
J Webster StaymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A.
Grace J GangDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.

Funding

Patient-specific, high-sensitivity spectral CT for assessment of pancreatic cancerR01EB030494 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE, NOËL, PETER B · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectral imaging has significantly improved the quantitative potential of CT compared to conventional single-energy acquisitions. However, spectral imaging is susceptible to bias, which can result in misclassification of materials and compromised quantitation accuracy. Bias quantification has traditionally relied on empirical approaches which require an ensemble of measurements and yield limited theoretical insights. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework for bias prediction in model-based material decomposition. The proposed method estimates statistical bias, which arises from the nonlinear propagation of noise during the decomposition process, and model mismatch bias, resulting from discrepancies between the assumed forward model and actual data acquisition. We validated the predicted bias with empirical measurements over a wide range of imaging conditions including spectral separation, mAs, and varying amount of mismatches in the spectral responses. Statistical bias prediction shows excellent agreement with empirical measurements except at very low levels of spectral separation and mAs. Model mismatch bias increases with increasing mismatch in spectral responses, and appears to be more sensitive to perturbations in tube potential than effective energy. The theoretical model developed in this work accurately predicts bias in a wide range of imaging conditions, facilitating the design of bias-tolerant spectral systems.

Indexed as

BiasComputed tomography (CT)Material decompositionSpectral CT

Identifiers

PMID42063533
PMCPMC13128016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.