ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026
Theoretical Prediction of Bias in Model-Based Material Decomposition.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spectral imaging has significantly improved the quantitative potential of CT compared to conventional single-energy acquisitions. However, spectral imaging is susceptible to bias, which can result in misclassification of materials and compromised quantitation accuracy. Bias quantification has traditionally relied on empirical approaches which require an ensemble of measurements and yield limited theoretical insights. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework for bias prediction in model-based material decomposition. The proposed method estimates statistical bias, which arises from the nonlinear propagation of noise during the decomposition process, and model mismatch bias, resulting from discrepancies between the assumed forward model and actual data acquisition. We validated the predicted bias with empirical measurements over a wide range of imaging conditions including spectral separation, mAs, and varying amount of mismatches in the spectral responses. Statistical bias prediction shows excellent agreement with empirical measurements except at very low levels of spectral separation and mAs. Model mismatch bias increases with increasing mismatch in spectral responses, and appears to be more sensitive to perturbations in tube potential than effective energy. The theoretical model developed in this work accurately predicts bias in a wide range of imaging conditions, facilitating the design of bias-tolerant spectral systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.