Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063527›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Are we there yet with XNA aptamers?

Santiago Chaillou, Saphyra Thonon, Sten Reynders, Eveline Lescrinier, Vitor B Pinheiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Santiago ChaillouKU Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences Herestraat, 49 Leuven 3000 Belgium v.pinheiro@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0348-3349
Saphyra ThononKU Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences Herestraat, 49 Leuven 3000 Belgium v.pinheiro@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4653-881X
Sten ReyndersKU Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences Herestraat, 49 Leuven 3000 Belgium v.pinheiro@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3819-722X
Eveline LescrinierKU Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences Herestraat, 49 Leuven 3000 Belgium v.pinheiro@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-4329
Vitor B PinheiroKU Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences Herestraat, 49 Leuven 3000 Belgium v.pinheiro@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-0028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their original development, aptamers (or nucleic acid oligomers of defined sequence that are capable of high-affinity and high-specificity binding to a target) have been heralded as possible and promising new therapeutic modalities. Increasingly versatile and customizable aptamer selection (SELEX) processes, alongside incorporation of novel synthetic nucleic acid (XNA) chemistries, have played a key role in the development of therapeutically relevant molecules. Nonetheless, despite the significant progress in the last 40 years, clinical applications of aptamers remain a nascent field. This review summarises some of the key developments in the field in the last 40 years, highlighting the progress made in aptamer selection, XNA chemistries and computational analyses. We discuss the intricacies and limitations of the current gold standard in aptamer SELEX and underscore the added complexities of XNA incorporation. Reflecting on the distinction between the antibody and aptamer fields, we advocate how a more mature understanding of this class of molecules could be driving the next generation of applications.

Identifiers

PMID42063527
PMCPMC13126262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.