ArticleBrain communications2026
Multiscale connectivity framework for working memory network in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia survivors.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working memory impairments are a common late effect in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, yet the structural network substrates of these difficulties remain poorly defined. Existing connectomic studies often rely on whole-brain parcellations, overlooking working memory-associated circuitry and multiscale organization. We developed a multiscale structural connectivity framework to investigate working memory-associated networks using diffusion MRI and performed a cross-sectional study with 70 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia survivors and 70 age and sex matched healthy controls. Working memory-relevant regions were identified based on functional activation patterns, and structural connectomes were constructed at two spatial scales: a fine-scale 76-node network and a coarser 24-node network derived from spatially contiguous, architecturally and functionally coherent regional groupings, as defined in the multimodal parcellation atlas of Human Connectome Project. Graph theoretical metrics, clustering coefficient, Eigenvector centrality, local assortativity and participation coefficient were computed to assess local network topology. Group comparisons were conducted with false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons. Compared to healthy controls, survivors exhibited marked topological shifts. Specifically, clustering and assortativity were increased in the caudate, putamen and thalamus but decreased in the frontoparietal cortex. In contrast, centrality and participation showed the opposite pattern, signalling subcortical segregation and cortical hyperintegration. These effects were consistent across both spatial scales. Additional findings included scale-specific effects unique to the fine scale, as well as heterogeneous fine-scale patterns that resolved into consistent regional changes at the coarse scale. All effects remained significant after false discovery rate correction, highlighting the robustness of the network reorganization. Our framework combining a targeted working memory network with multiscale connectomic analysis proves its worth by revealing structural changes of working memory circuitry in survivors compared to healthy controls. The results show a broad reorganization, with weakened cortical networks and strengthened subcortical circuits, possibly as a form of compensation. These insights sharpen our understanding of treatment-related structural network alterations and point to new targets for future studies of cognitive outcomes and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.