ArticleJSES international2026
Radiographic outcomes of the humeral stem after treating a proximal humerus fracture with an uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter retrospective review.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for proximal humerus fractures is becoming more common. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiographic outcomes of uncemented rTSA for proximal humerus fractures and compare these outcomes based on 3 different implants. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients treated with uncemented primary rTSA for acute proximal humerus fracture at 2 large healthcare institutions using one of 3 different humeral stem designs. Group A (n = 46) received a Zimmer TM stem, group B (n = 27) received a DJO Altivate stem, and group C (n = 18) received a Medacta stem for a total of 159 patients. Three independent reviewers assessed the most recent x-rays for 1) humeral subsidence, 2) humeral tilt, 3) humeral radiolucent lines, 4) humeral stem at risk for loosening, 5) osteolysis, 6) humeral stress shielding, 7) component failure, 8) spot welds, 9) scapular notching, and 10) tuberosity union. Results: The mean follow-up was 21 months (range, 6 months to 10 years). The average age at the time of surgery was 71.0 years old. Radiographic analysis showed group C (67%) was associated with significantly higher rates of stress shielding compared to group B (19%) and group A (6.5%) ( Conclusion: Overall, we found significant variability in radiographic performance, particularly regarding stress shielding and risk of stem loosening when evaluating radiographic outcomes of these 3 cementless humeral stem designs used in rTSA for proximal humerus fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.