ArticleJSES international2026
Relationship between pre-operative central sensitization and post-operative outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair-longitudinal outcomes over 2 post-operative years.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whether pre-operative central sensitization (CS) affects post-operative outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the potential association between pre-operative CS and post-operative pain and function for 2 years in patients who underwent ARCR for small-to-medium rotator cuff tears. Methods: Sixty patients with small-to-medium full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent ARCR and were followed up for 24 months post-operatively were enrolled. The presence or absence of CS was evaluated using the Japanese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (short form). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of CS, with scores ≥10 defined as CS. Baseline demographic and radiologic factors (eg, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, occupation, tear size, and fatty infiltration) were recorded and compared between groups. Post-operative outcomes, including pain (numerical rating scale), shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, and clinical scores (Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), were assessed at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Rotator cuff integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Results: CS was present in 45% of patients. There were no significant differences in baseline demographic, clinical, or radiologic factors, as well as in pre-operative shoulder joint range of motion, strength, or pain between the groups with and without CS. Patients with CS exhibited significantly less improvement in pain on motion, abduction strength, and clinical scores at multiple time points up to 18 months; by 24 months, however, these differences had diminished. Conclusion: Pre-operative CS may be associated with delayed improvement in post-operative motion-related pain and clinical scores after ARCR, although its long-term impact appears limited. Clinicians should consider pre-operative CS among factors that may affect post-operative functional recovery, particularly in the first 18 months, with no apparent difference by 24 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.