ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Comparison of amide proton transfer imaging and methionine PET for differentiating radiation necrosis and tumor recurrence after radiotherapy: A preliminary case series.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced brain necrosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence after radiotherapy remains a significant clinical challenge in patients with metastatic brain tumors and directly influences treatment decisions. Although methionine positron emission tomography (PET) has demonstrated diagnostic utility, its cost and limited availability restrict routine clinical use. Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is a noninvasive MRI-based technique that reflects tissue protein content and may provide complementary diagnostic information. This retrospective case series included 4 patients (5 lesions) with metastatic brain tumors who underwent both APT imaging and methionine PET for lesions suspicious for recurrence. An APT signal intensity ≥2.5%, derived from previously reported glioblastoma data, was used to define tumor recurrence. Among the 5 lesions, one was diagnosed as radiation necrosis and 4 as tumor recurrence. APT imaging demonstrated complete diagnostic concordance with methionine PET in all cases. Final diagnoses were established based on imaging findings and clinical follow-up without additional histopathological confirmation. In this small retrospective series, APT imaging showed findings concordant with methionine PET in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence following radiotherapy. Although limited by sample size and lack of histopathological confirmation, these results suggest that APT imaging may serve as a useful complementary imaging modality in the post-radiotherapy setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.