Observational studyMilitary Medical Research2026
Bridging the lung cancer screening eligibility gap: evaluation of guideline applicability in asymptomatic patients.
Observational study in Military Medical Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early-onset (<50 years) and never-smoker lung cancers are increasing global concerns. The emerging trends challenge current screening guidelines, which focus on adults aged >50 years with heavy smoking histories. We applied the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 screening criteria as the primary definition of high-risk individuals eligible for lung cancer screening and assessed the potential optimization of these criteria using real-world lung cancer data in China. Methods: In this nationwide, multicenter, hospital-based observational study, we enrolled asymptomatic patients with surgically resected primary lung cancer across 26 tertiary hospitals from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2021. Screening eligibility was classified using USPSTF 2021 criteria (aged 50-80 years, ≥20 pack-year smoking history, and ≤15 quit-years for former smokers). Temporal trends in eligibility, screening utilization, and mortality risks were assessed through joinpoint regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 106,266 asymptomatic patients with lung cancer were enrolled. Among the 102,555 patients with complete age and smoking information, only 8.8% (8985/102,555) met the USPSTF 2021 eligibility criteria. The eligibility proportion declined sharply from 21.6% (350/1617) in 2014 to 6.1% (1737/28,582) in 2021, with the annual percentage change being -17.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) -19.1 to -15.9]. Patients with screening utilization, irrespective of eligibility status, demonstrated a higher proportion of stage Ia diagnoses compared with those who were not screened. Screening- ineligible group exhibited 40% lower mortality risk overall [adjusted hazard ratio ( Conclusions: Rigid age- and smoking-based criteria overlook substantial at-risk populations in China. Implementing individualized risk stratification is essential to advance equitable lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.