ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2026
Clinical Remission in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma - A Single-Arm Observational Study with Benralizumab.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03907137 (Utilisation of Benralizumab in the Clinical Practise in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients in Switzerland), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Utilisation of Benralizumab in the Clinical Practise in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients in Switzerland
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate clinical remission rates and its individual components in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab, and to explore predictors of clinical remission using subgroup analyses by blood eosinophils, prior exacerbations, and previous biologic treatment. Patients and Methods: Data from a prospective, observational, non-interventional study (BEEPS, NCT03907137) of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) in Switzerland were analysed post-hoc. Benralizumab 30 mg was administered at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, and 8, followed by an 8-weekly regimen until week 56. Clinical remission was defined as meeting all four of the following criteria: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores < 1.5 or ≤ 0.75, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, no exacerbations, and a stable lung function. Patients were categorised into three pre-planned subgroups: (1) Blood eosinophils at baseline: 300-400 cells/μL and > 400 cells/μL; (2) exacerbations in the last 12 months: <4 and ≥4 exacerbations; (3) prior biologic treatment: naïve and experienced patients. Results: At baseline, no patients met all four criteria for clinical remission. After 56 weeks of benralizumab treatment, 58.1% of patients achieved all criteria when using ACQ-5 < 1.5, and 51.6% did so with ACQ-5 ≤ 0.75. Throughout the study, each individual remission criterion improved consistently over time. Across all subgroups, asthma symptoms and annualized exacerbation rates (AER) continuously decreased over the course of treatment. Conclusion: More than 50% of patients with SEA achieved clinical remission on treatment with benralizumab. Furthermore, benralizumab demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy across all patient subgroups, providing deeper insight into the characteristics and needs of these specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.