ArticleESC heart failure2026
Out-of-hours primary care management for patients with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLittle is known about the management and disease trajectories of heart failure (HF) patients in the pre-hospital setting when experiencing exacerbating symptoms. Shortness of breath (SOB) is a main reason for contacting out-of-hours primary care (OHS-PC). We aim to describe the care trajectories of these patients with HF at the OHS-PC with exacerbating symptom SOB and to assess 6-month outcomes regarding mortality and hospital admissions.
methodsWe included patients who contacted Dutch OHS-PC for SOB between September 2020 and August 2021. We selected those in whom HF was considered to be the cause for consultation and further clinical evaluation. We applied descriptive analyses to characterize these patients and their disease trajectories following this OHS-PC contact and compared patients referred to the Emergency Department (ED) to those who remained in primary care.
resultsOf 1833 calls for SOB, 102 (5.1%) concerned patients with HF, who had a mean age of 79.6 ± 11.1 years, and 53% were women. Ten (9.8%) patients were directly referred to the ED. The remaining 92 (90.2%) were first assessed by a general practitioner (GP): 62 (60.8%) received a home visit, 15 (14.7%) were seen at the OHS-PC clinic, and 15 (14.7%) received a telephone advice only. Of these 92 patients, 41 (44.6%) patients were subsequently referred to the ED, and 39 (42.4%) were kept at home and received loop diuretics (newly initiated or increased dose). Of the 51 patients referred to the ED (directly or after assessment with the GP), 42 patients (82.4%, P-value < .001) were admitted. Six-month all-cause mortality of the 102 patients was 32.3%.
conclusionAt the OHS-PC, one in every 20 contacts for SOB is a HF patient who has a high 6-month mortality risk. Patients were directly referred to the hospital or received initiation or up-titration of loop diuretics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.