ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026
Psychological Impact of Autism Screening on Caregivers.
Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism screening in childhood is common, yet little is known about its potential psychological impact on caregivers. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent national panel of disease prevention experts, stated that this gap in knowledge limited their ability to endorse universal autism screening. This study examined the psychological impact of autism screening, using data from a large community-based sample (n = 1272) involving online caregiver-completed autism screeners at child age 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. Caregivers completed the Participation Impact Questionnaire retrospectively (mean child age at completion 37.2 ± 4.8 months) to measure feelings about screening. A minority (34.7%) of the sample reported presence of ≥ 1 negative feeling; the most commonly endorsed was "worried". Among this subset, negative feelings were of short duration (lasted for < 1 day in 56.9%), were mild in severity (86.4%), and did not affect functioning (85.3%). A majority (86.2%) also reported ≥ 1 positive feeling. Our findings address a critical evidence gap regarding potential harms of autism screening and support universal screening, given that psychological harms are not common and have low functional impact, as well as possible psychological benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.