Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063200›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2026

Population-level migration modeling of North America's birds through data integration with BirdFlow.

Yangkang Chen, David L Slager, Ethan Plunkett, Miguel Fuentes, Yuting Deng, Stuart A Mackenzie, Lucas E Berrigan, Daniel Fink, Daniel Sheldon, Benjamin M Van Doren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yangkang ChenDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
David L SlagerCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Ethan PlunkettCollege of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Miguel FuentesCollege of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Yuting DengCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Stuart A MackenzieBirds Canada, Port Rowan, ON, Canada.
Lucas E BerriganBirds Canada, Port Rowan, ON, Canada.
Daniel FinkCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Daniel SheldonCollege of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Benjamin M Van DorenDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA. vandoren@illinois.edu.
Adriaan M DokterCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. amd427@cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate information on population-level movements of migratory animals is essential for understanding migration and for designing effective conservation strategies in a changing world. Yet such information remains scarce for most migratory species due to the effort and expense needed to collect data across their full distribution ranges. BirdFlow is a probabilistic modeling framework that infers population-level movements from weekly species distribution maps produced by the participatory science project eBird. However, BirdFlow models have only been tuned for a handful of species using high-resolution individual tracking data, which is not available for most migratory species.

methodsHere, we introduce a general tuning and evaluation framework for BirdFlow that enables the first large-scale integration of distributional and individual-level data to infer animal movement across continents and hundreds of migratory species, eliminating reliance on any single individual-tracking data source. By generalizing the BirdFlow model parametrization, we enable tuning and validation using multiple complementary data sources, including GPS tracks, banding recoveries, and radio telemetry data from the Motus Wildlife Tracking System. We investigate the efficacy of this approach by (1) investigating predictive performance compared to null models; (2) validating the biological plausibility of BirdFlow models by comparing movement properties such as route straightness, number of stopovers, and migration speed between model-generated routes and real movement tracks; and (3) comparing the performance of models tuned on species-specific movement data to models tuned using hyperparameters transferred from other species.

resultsOur results show that BirdFlow models produced by the new tuning framework achieve biologically realistic performance, even for prediction horizons of thousands of kilometers and several months. When species-specific data are unavailable, models can still be tuned using data from other phylogenetically adjacent species to achieve improved performance.

conclusionsBy integrating eBird Status & Trends abundance surfaces with data from banding recaptures, radio telemetry, and GPS tracking, we scale BirdFlow models to 153 North American migratory species, representing the first collection of continental-scale population-level movement and forecasting models. Species-specific tuning improves population-level movement forecasts, while taxonomically informed hyperparameter transfer supports the modeling of data-limited species. Overall, our work offers a foundation for more accurate predictions across hundreds of species for research in ecology and conservation, disease surveillance, aviation, and public outreach.

Indexed as

Big dataBird migrationMacroecologyMovement ecologyMulti-source dataPopulation ecologyProbabilistic modelingSpatiotemporal modeling

Identifiers

PMID42063200
PMCPMC13285298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.