Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063193›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2026

The uropygial gland of the European hoopoe as a symbiotic organ.

Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Ángela Martínez-García, Juan M Peralta-Sánchez, Michael Schaub, Raphaël Arlettaz, Antonio M Martín-Platero, Ester Martínez-Renau, María Dolores Barón, Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez, Estefanía López-Hernández and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Manuel Martín-VivaldiDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain. mmv@ugr.es.
Ángela Martínez-GarcíaIES Padre Manjón, Granada, 18003, Spain.
Juan M Peralta-SánchezDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, 41012, Spain.
Michael SchaubSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, 6204, Switzerland.
Raphaël ArlettazDivision of Conservation Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, 3012, Switzerland.
Antonio M Martín-PlateroDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Ester Martínez-RenauDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
María Dolores BarónDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), Almería, 04120, Spain.
Magdalena Ruiz-RodríguezDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Estefanía López-HernándezDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Manuel Martínez-BuenoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Eva ValdiviaDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Juan J SolerDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), Almería, 04120, Spain. jsoler@eeza.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimals rely on symbiotic bacteria living within/on their tissues for multiple functions, while simultaneously needing to protect themselves via immune functions or other defenses from potentially pathogenic microorganisms that could invade those tissues. As a result, interactions with complex assemblages of bacteria have driven the evolution of host strategies to control established symbioses. One such strategy involves the development of organs specialized in maintaining associations with beneficial members of the microbial community — so-called symbiotic organs. These organs are characterized by compartmentalizing spaces where favorable conditions for the beneficial bacteria are promoted, while preventing colonization of other tissues. Although several model systems of symbiotic organs have been studied in animals, none have been recognized in non-aquatic vertebrates except for the intestinal crypts of mammals. Here, we propose that bird´s uropygial glands may be specialized symbiotic organs.

resultsWe tested this hypothesis using the uropygial gland of the hoopoe (Upupa epops) as a model, which hosts a complex bacterial community that includes antimicrobial-producing symbionts. First, we examined whether the uropygial gland supports a specific symbiotic community, by comparing the microbiome composition of the uropygial secretions and eggshell surfaces in two European hoopoe populations. Additionally, using histological staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we looked for structural specializations for compartmentalization and bacterial targeting in the glands of nesting hoopoes in comparison to non-breeding individuals lacking the symbiosis. Results show that, in comparison with bacterial communities of the eggshells, those of the uropygial gland were more conserved between both populations. Moreover, uropygial glands of nesting hoopoes were strictly compartmentalized by a special tissue, properties that are absent in the non-breeding individuals lacking the symbiosis. Finally, bacteria were organized within the organ, suggesting the existence of special physical niches to promote specialized mutualistic symbionts.

conclusionsAll evidence supports that the hoopoe uropygial gland is a specialized symbiotic organ for bacterial cultivation, paving the way for new insights into vertebrates’ exocrine glands’ role in microbial symbiosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ARISABacterial communityCoevolutionGeographic variationIlluminaMutualistic symbiosisSymbiotic organsUropygial secretion

Identifiers

PMID42063193
PMCPMC13130528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.