ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026
Using co-design to create a fit-for-purpose debriefing framework for at-scale healthcare simulation.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that debriefing within or following simulation-based education promotes reflection on and about practice. Resuming in-person simulations post-COVID-19 in our educational setting revealed that post-simulation debriefing was lacking. Given the large numbers of students and casual clinical educators we embarked on a project to reintroduce debriefing to simulation activities. While several frameworks exist to guide debriefing in clinical settings, approaches to debriefing undergraduate students in educational settings differ in intent and context and needs to align with local curricula and regulatory standards of practice. Acknowledging the substantial impact to teaching practices of this project, we used an educational co-design approach to maximise staff engagement, ownership and adoption of a local fit-for-purpose debriefing framework. We applied the 5 steps within the educational Connected Learning at Scale framework to project activities: explore/ideate; plan/design; build/test; implement/observe and reflect/evaluate. The aim of this paper is to provide details of the processes undertaken in developing an evidence-informed fit-for-purpose tool for use at-scale, engendering engagement and ownership, for context specific implementation. While developed with debriefing for simulation in mind, the localised, fit-for-purpose tool is flexible and appropriate to use for other university learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.