Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063143›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

The six phases of prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support: a conceptual framework.

Kenneth R Hoffman, Arne Diehl, Paul Nixon, Sarah A Yong, Eddy Fan, Carol Hodgson, Aidan J C Burrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenneth R HoffmanIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia. k.hoffman@alfred.org.au.
Arne DiehlIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul NixonIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah A YongIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Carol HodgsonAustralia and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Aidan J C BurrellIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is a complex and invasive intervention used increasingly in the management of severe respiratory failure. Once established, the management of prolonged V-V ECMO support involves balancing priorities of lung protection, prevention of pulmonary complications, sedation weaning and safe reduction in ECMO support. These occur variably as the pulmonary pathology resolves and ECMO support is reduced. Evidence based strategies to assist clinicians during prolonged V-V ECMO support are lacking, with the majority of literature focussing on ventilation strategies following ECMO initiation and the criteria for separation from V-V ECMO once liberation is considered safe. Practice is largely clinician and institution dependent with significant heterogeneity. There are numerous questions which remain unanswered regarding the prioritisation and strategies for safe V-V ECMO weaning. This review aimed to provide a novel conceptual framework to assist clinicians by dividing prolonged V-V ECMO support into six phases: ultra-lung-protective, lung protective, transition to spontaneous breathing, liberation trial, decannulation and post decannulation support. We reviewed existing literature and identified knowledge gaps for future research.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansRespiratory InsufficiencyTime FactorsVentilator WeaningARDSRespiratory failureVeno-venous ECMOWeaning

Identifiers

PMID42063143
PMCPMC13277115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.