ArticleBMC medical education2026
Uncovering the informal learning of patient safety in undergraduate clinical clerkships: a qualitative study of patient safety specialists' perspectives.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes patient safety as a core competency, formal educational opportunities in clinical settings remain limited. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patient safety specialists regarding the informal learning opportunities that expose medical students to patient safety competencies during clinical clerkships.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 34 of 36 patient safety specialists at Japanese national university hospitals. Data were collected via an online open-ended questionnaire regarding safety-related behaviors students engaged in during clinical practice. The responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
resultsThe analysis identified 14 learning categories situated within four clinical contexts: receiving instructions, invasive procedures, interprofessional communication, and incident response. These competencies are closely aligned with the WHO Patient Safety Curriculum Guide. However, the learning related to quality improvement was notably limited. Participants proposed specific support measures such as utilizing incident reports for education and facilitating student participation in safety conferences to further enhance these informal learning opportunities.
conclusionClinical environments provide latent opportunities for students to engage with essential patient safety competencies through informal participation in clinical practice and complementing formal curricula. Clinical educators should recognize the value of these situated learning opportunities and intentionally facilitate informal learning environments to complement formal education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.