ArticleBMC biotechnology2026
Machine learning optimized callogenesis in Justicia gendarussa Burm. f. and phytochemical profiling of in vitro derived callus and leaf extracts.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn vitro callus culture systems have been well documented to increase the production of bioactive metabolites. However, optimization of culture conditions through traditional methods consumes time and resources. In the current study, we utilized Machine Learning (ML) tools to improve callus formation conventions. The resultant callus and the leaf tissues of the mother plant were analyzed for their phytochemical profiles to gain insights into the altered synthesis of metabolites.
methodsLeaf explants were grown in the dark on Murashige & Skoog medium (MS) with 28 altered plant growth regulator combinations. The parameters of callogenesis were measured and analyzed using a generalized regression neural network (GRNN) to predict optimal hormone concentrations. Predicted concentrations were validated through in vitro experiments. Metabolite quantification assays and profiling were carried out through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
resultsThe mean earliest callus initiation was calculated as 14.9 days in MS media fortified with 3 mg/L 2,4-D and 0.5 mg/L BAP. The maximum callus mean fresh weight was recorded as 2.948 g in MS media with 2.5 mg/L 2,4-D and 1.0 mg/L BAP. The data obtained through experimentation were fed into a machine learning model to predict the optimal concentrations for callus initiation and maximum callus fresh weight. Machine learning predicted the earliest callus initiation as the 14th day if grown in MS media with 2.92 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.35 mg/L Kin, and 0.17 mg/L BAP, which closely aligns with validated experimental results showing 15.1 days. The predicted callus fresh weight of 2.954 g in MS media with 2.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.11 mg/L Kin, and 0.91 mg/L BAP on validation was in sync with the experimental results, amounting to 3.004 ± 0.098 g, and hence was used for subculturing. Phytochemical analysis indicated notable increases in phenolic (1.22-fold) and flavonoid (1.27-fold) contents in callus extracts compared to mother plant leaves, whereas terpenoid levels were lower.
conclusionThe current study demonstrates the effective incorporation of ML in optimal callogenesis. It highlights the improved accumulation of phenolics and flavonoids in calli obtained from ML optimized conditions, emphasizing its precise prediction in maximizing output. These findings can contribute to the development of efficient biotechnological strategies for the production of pharmaceutically important phytochemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.