ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Immune parameters monitored during the production period of laying hens managed with or without single-dose vaccination against erysipelas.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErysipelas, caused by infection with Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ER), is an emerging disease in non-cage housed laying hens. According to Swedish field experience outbreaks seem more common in older flocks and may also occur in flocks vaccinated against erysipelas. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess single-dose vaccination outcome in laying hens with respect to antibody titres to ER and to monitor selected immune parameters to identify putative risk factors for erysipelas. Blood samples were collected from laying hen flocks at 30, 50 and 75 weeks of age. At each time point, 5 unvaccinated flocks and 5 flocks that had been vaccinated against erysipelas once at placement were sampled (20 hens/flock, total n=600).
resultsThe results showed that the majority of hens were positive for IgY to ER and that the antibody titres were higher in older hens irrespective of vaccination status. Vaccinated hens had significantly higher IgY titres to ER compared to those of unvaccinated hens. This difference was most prominent for the youngest age category. Among the different leukocyte populations studied, blood heterophil, monocyte and γ/δTCR+ T-cell counts were significantly higher in younger hens. Also, serum MBL-levels were significantly higher in younger hens and MBL-levels were positively correlated to heterophil and monocyte counts at the individual level.
conclusionsTaken together, results indicate that ER or antigenically similar bacteria are common in the hen environment and that this exposure results in antibodies recognising ER that are present at higher levels in older laying hens. In addition, a higher general pathogen load/level of subclinical infections was indicated by altered leukogram patterns and increased MBL-levels in the youngest age category. Nonetheless, among the parameters studied we found no evidence to suggest that antibody responses to single-dose vaccination should fail or why older flocks seem more susceptible to erysipelas outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.