ArticleBMC medical education2026
Teaching for the future: a weekly, cross-site, multidisciplinary, hybrid burns teaching programme.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEducation of the multidisciplinary burns team is essential for optimising patient outcomes but can be challenging, particularly when coordinating across multiple sites and ensuring consistent engagement. There is a recognised gap in providing comprehensive, interdisciplinary education that covers all aspects of burn care. Hybrid teaching models, combining face-to-face and online delivery, offer a practical solution to address these challenges while promoting collaboration and engagement across the team. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a structured, cross-site hybrid teaching programme designed to provide comprehensive, interdisciplinary education for the multidisciplinary burns team.
methodsA weekly hybrid teaching programme was delivered to the multidisciplinary team over 21 months in a burns centre, with topics aligned to the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme for Plastic Surgery. Participant feedback was collected using QR code surveys at the end of each session. Over 60 sessions, with more than 500 responses were analysed, assessing session enjoyability, delivery, quality, and self-reported confidence in the topics presented.
resultsMean ratings for session enjoyability, delivery, and quality exceeded 4.7 on a Likert scale out of 5. Self-reported confidence in the delivered topics increased significantly, from 2.9 to 4.2 (p < 0.001). The programme facilitated interprofessional collaboration, team building, and professional development while overcoming geographical barriers. Iterative improvements based on participant feedback contributed to sustained engagement and educational value.
conclusionA well-structured hybrid teaching programme can effectively enhance knowledge, confidence, and collaboration within the multidisciplinary burns team. This model is adaptable to other burns centres, with potential for long-term benefits on clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.