ArticleBMC health services research2026
Quantifying the U.S. surgical instrument fleet and its reprocessing burden: implications for cost and sustainability in healthcare.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReusable surgical instruments require repeated sterilization between procedures, yet many instruments prepared for surgery are never used. The national scale of the reusable surgical instrument fleet and its associated reprocessing burden remain poorly quantified.
methodsAggregated operational data from 251 U.S. healthcare facilities encompassing 2,618 operating rooms were analyzed to quantify instrument inventories, sterilization volume, and instrument loss. National estimates were derived by scaling operating room-level metrics to reported U.S. operating room capacity. Published sterilization cost estimates and instrument utilization rates were applied to estimate national sterilization expenditures and idle reprocessing costs. Replacement costs for missing instruments were modeled using log normal price distributions and Monte Carlo simulation.
resultsThe dataset included 336,784 trays and 6.7 million instruments, with 236 million instruments reprocessed annually. National extrapolation suggests a reusable instrument fleet of approximately 112 million instruments and nearly 4 billion annual reprocessing events. Estimated annual sterilization costs ranged from $1.3 to $11.8 billion.
conclusionsThis study provides an initial estimate of the national cost of surgical instrument reprocessing in the U.S. Further work is required to determine a national estimate of the percentage of instruments that go unused. Nevertheless, the scale of expenditures on this process indicates there will be significant opportunities to improve perioperative efficiency and reduce waste through better inventory management yielding substantial cost savings and decreasing the environmental footprint of surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.