Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062995›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Feelings, thoughts, and attitudes of pregnant women towards newborn heel blood screening test: a mixed-methods study.

Cemile Say, Refika Genç, Mustafa Kılavuz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cemile SayDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5717-6962
Refika GençDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4373-703X
Mustafa KılavuzDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey. mkilavuz@adiyaman.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8094-3927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the feelings, thoughts, and attitudes of pregnant women towards the newborn heel blood screening test. The research has a mixed-methods design, where quantitative and qualitative data are evaluated together. The study was conducted between December 14, 2023, and May 5, 2024, and included 288 women whose pregnancies were confirmed biochemically, clinically, and radiologically. Data were collected through a questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions, prepared based on a literature review and developed with expert opinion. Quantitative findings showed that marital status was significantly associated with selected newborn heel blood screening test-related statements. Chi-square analysis indicated that single pregnant women were significantly more likely than married women to report reading about the newborn heel blood screening test and to state that they had not encountered children developing allergic reactions following the test (χ

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeonatal ScreeningPregnant PeopleAdultEmotionsFemaleHeelHumansInfant, NewbornMarital StatusPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHeel bloodMixed methodNewbornPregnancyScreening test

Identifiers

PMID42062995
PMCPMC13277148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.