ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Association between health system navigation factors and preventable trauma mortality in Western Cape, South Africa.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimely access to trauma care is critical to reducing injury mortality. In the Western Cape of South Africa, trauma care is delivered in a tiered system. Resource limitations at lower facility levels-such as limited imaging, surgical access, or after-hours support-necessitate transfers to higher levels for on-going care of serious injury. Delays-including delays from transfers-can impact mortality. This study quantitatively reexamines a cohort of trauma decedents to further elucidate system navigation factors associated with preventable trauma mortality.
methodsIn the Western Cape, an ongoing, observational cohort study, Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care (EpiC), enrolls adult patients who experience major trauma. In 2024, a multi-disciplinary expert panel determined preventability of EpiC trauma deaths. Injury details and process indicators (e.g., time of arrival, length of stay, interfacility transfers (IFT)) for each case were captured by the EpiC study. Characteristics of preventable versus non-preventable cases were compared using Chi-square, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and logistic regression analysis to assess associations between health system navigation factors and preventable trauma mortality.
resultsA total of 160 cases were included: 63 were preventable (39.4%) and 97 were non-preventable (60.6%). Though the median total health facility length of stay was found to be significantly higher in the preventable death cohort (39.7 h; IQR 5.7, 184.8) versus non-preventable (10.3 h; IQR 1.5, 59.1); p-value = 0.0024), the majority of deaths occurred in the emergency centre (EC) in both groups (54% preventable cohort, 68% non-preventable cohort, p-value = 0.2232). There was no statistically significant increased odds of preventable death when examining EC length of stay or arrival to an EC during a less resourced time. However, independent of injury severity and first EC length of stay, there was a significant association between patients receiving IFT and increased odds of dying from a preventable death (OR 2.94, 95%CI 1.09-7.87).
conclusionThese findings likely demonstrate IFT as a marker of increased trauma system complexity and extended exposure to system vulnerabilities across multiple phases of care. Tiered trauma systems in resource-constrained settings should account for this association in system design and operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.