Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062877›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026

Patient experiences and perceived efficacy of a newly implemented hospital-based withdrawal management unit in Vancouver, Canada: findings from the Road to Recovery evaluation.

Sidney Roberge, Seonaid Nolan, Cheyenne Johnson, Piper Dickhout, Ava Abramowich, Travis De Wolfe, Renee Janssen, Erika Mundel, Andrea Ryan, Ian Haynes and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sidney RobergeFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Seonaid NolanBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Cheyenne JohnsonBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Piper DickhoutBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Ava AbramowichBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Travis De WolfeBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Renee JanssenDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Erika MundelDivision of Addiction, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada.
Andrea RyanDivision of Addiction, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada.
Ian HaynesDivision of Addiction, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada.
Laurel Lemchuk-FavelIndigenous Wellness and Reconciliation, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada.
Harmony JohnsonIndigenous Wellness and Reconciliation, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada.
Brittany DennisBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada. britt.dennis@bccsu.ubc.ca.

Funding

University of British Columbia Steven Diamond Professorship in Addiction Care Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Road to Recovery (R2R) initiative represents an innovative approach to substance use care in British Columbia, Canada, that is designed to provide timely, comprehensive, and culturally safe services for individuals with a substance use disorder (SUD). This survey sought to understand patient experiences with this new care model.

methodsAdults (≥ 18 years) with a SUD who accessed R2R's new hospital-based withdrawal management unit in Vancouver, Canada between May 2024 and April 2025 were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey that captured their individual experiences. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses.

results87 participants completed the survey. The mean age was 41 years (Standard Deviation [SD] = 15); 57% (n = 50) identified as male, and 49% (n = 43) as Indigenous. The majority (n = 58, 67%) of respondents reported access to withdrawal management services in ≤ 48 h. A total of 91% (n = 79) of participants felt the quality of care was 'good' or 'excellent', 90% (n = 78) reported positive interactions with staff, 88% (n = 68) of respondents felt their withdrawal symptoms were adequately managed, 91% (n = 71) believed the program helped them achieve their treatment goals. Among participants visited by Indigenous Wellness Liaisons (IWLs) (n = 56), 77% (n = 43) completely trusted IWLs, and 52% (n = 17) reported that their cultural and spiritual needs were completely met by IWLs. Peer support was valued by 85% of respondents for providing empathy and motivation. One-third (n = 29, 33%) of participants contemplated leaving during their admission, most commonly because of the absence of engaging activities (n = 12, 41%,). Overall, 95% said they would recommend the program to others.

conclusionsFindings highlight that the R2R model delivers timely, high-quality, and culturally safe withdrawal management care. Patients emphasized the value of respectful staff, effective medical management, and integration of Indigenous and peer supports. Enhancing structured programming and expanding access to psychosocial and cultural services may further improve engagement and reduce early discharge. Embedding trauma-informed, interdisciplinary, and culturally grounded approaches within hospital-based withdrawal management may improve patient experience and retention, informing future models of addiction care in Canada.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionSubstance-Related DisordersSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAdultBritish ColumbiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAddiction medicineHealth service evaluationIntegrated carePatient experienceQuality improvementSubstance useWithdrawal management

Identifiers

PMID42062877
PMCPMC13135699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.