ArticleBMC genomics2026
Divided-and-combined association test for pleiotropic effects with GWAS summary statistics.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted over the past two decades have focused on testing the one-to-one association between genetic variants and complex diseases or phenotypes. Despite their considerable success, such one-to-one testing approaches are underpowered because they do not utilize information on pleiotropic effects. Currently available public GWAS summary statistics provide resources for multi-trait association testing. Quadratic statistics are widely used to detect pleiotropic effects, as they follow a chi-square or weighted chi-square distribution under the null hypothesis. Nevertheless, such methods often fail to achieve superior power. To address this limitation, this study proposes a divided-and-combined association test (DCAT) for detecting pleiotropic effects using GWAS summary statistics. DCAT constructs the covariance matrix of Z-scores by combining phenotype correlation and genotype partial correlation via the Kronecker product. It consists of a family of quadratic statistics with different covariance matrix weights and leverages the respective advantages of each statistic. The distribution of each statistic is then approximated using a location-shifted generalized gamma distribution for p-value calculation, with the resulting p-values integrated via the Cauchy combination test. Simulation results demonstrate that DCAT controls the type I error at a reasonable level and achieves the highest statistical power in most scenarios. In the real-data analysis of four cardiovascular diseases, DCAT identifies more significant genes compared with the other four representative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.