ArticleBMC psychology2026
The impact of power on implicit attitudes toward violence: empathy as a mediator and moderator.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttitudes toward violence can be assessed using both explicit self-report measures and implicit paradigms. However, little is known about how situational power influences such implicit evaluations and how empathy shapes this process. Power has been identified as a potential factor influencing implicit attitudes toward violence, while empathy may serve as a protective buffer. This study aimed to examine how different forms of power affect implicit attitudes toward violence and to clarify the mediating and moderating roles of empathy.
methodsTwo experimental studies were conducted. In Study 1, explicit power was primed through a recall task. Participants' state empathy and implicit attitudes toward violence were subsequently measured. In Study 2, implicit power was primed using a conceptual word-search task, and trait empathy was assessed as a potential moderator. Both studies utilized the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure implicit violent attitudes.
resultsIn Study 1, participants primed with a high sense of power exhibited significantly lower state empathy, which was associated with less negative implicit evaluations of violence. In Study 2, trait empathy moderated the relationship between power and implicit evaluations of violence: lower levels of trait empathy were associated with less negative implicit evaluations of violence under power priming.
conclusionThese findings suggest that both explicit and implicit power priming are associated with shifts in implicitly measured evaluations of violence, and that empathy plays a key regulatory role. Specifically, state empathy showed a significant indirect effect in Experiment 1, whereas trait empathy functioned as a boundary condition in Experiment 2. These findings point to different roles of empathy in the association between power priming and implicitly measured evaluations of violence, and suggest potential implications for understanding how power relates to attitudes toward violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.