Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062767›Full record

ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2026

Future Directions in Biotechnological and Pharmacological Applications of CAIs.

Claudiu T Supuran, Neera Raghav

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudiu T SupuranDepartment of NEUROFARBA, Section of Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Sciences, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy. claudiu.supuran@unifi.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-0323
Neera RaghavDepartment of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India. nraghav@kuk.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 50 different chemotypes were described so far to possess carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) inhibitory action, through five different inhibition mechanisms: zinc coordination, anchoring to the zinc-coordinated water molecule; occluding the active site entrance; out of the active site binding, and halogen bond formation with the proton shuttling residues. It is conceivable that future research will evidence new CA inhibitors (CAIs) and novel mechanisms of inhibition. Presently, the emerging trends in CAI research include, apart the search for new inhibitors, the design of hybrid drugs incorporating CAIs and other pharmacological agents, the design of PROTACs targeting various CA isoforms, as well as expanding the clinical utility of such compounds for the management of tumors, cerebral ischemia, arthritis, neuropathic pain, and infections produced by bacteria, fungi, and protozoans. From the biotechnological viewpoint, CAs may be highly useful for carbon dioxide capture technologies.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCarbonic AnhydrasesAnimalsDrug DesignHumansProteolysis Targeting ChimeraCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCarbonic AnhydrasesProteolysis Targeting ChimeraCarbonic anhydraseHybrid drugInhibition mechanismInhibitorMultitargetingPROTAC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.