ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2026
Computational Approaches and Structure-Based Drug Design of CAIs.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human carbonic anhydrases (hCAs) are emerging as increasingly relevant therapeutic targets due to their involvement in a broad spectrum of pathological conditions, ranging from glaucoma and epilepsy to cancer, neuroinflammation, metabolic disorders, and obesity. The coexistence of 15 isoforms with distinct catalytic activities and tissue distributions makes selectivity a central challenge in the development of CA inhibitors (CAIs). Recent advances in computational chemistry, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD) have significantly accelerated the identification of new chemotypes and selective modulators.This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of in silico strategies applied to CAIs, including pharmacophore modeling, Virtual Screening, docking, molecular dynamics (MD), MM-GBSA, and AI-driven predictive modeling. Case studies illustrate how Ligand-Based and Structure-Based approaches have led to the discovery of selective inhibitors for hCAs. A special emphasis is placed on structure-function relationships, including peculiar active-site features responsible for isoform differentiation and exploitable for rational ligand design.Furthermore, the chapter highlights recent ML- and DL-based frameworks trained on large biochemical datasets, capable of predicting potency and selectivity with high accuracy. Notably, the integration of explainable AI tools and experimental validation demonstrates the potential of computational pipelines in guiding hit identification and optimization.Overall, this chapter underscores the increasingly synergistic role of computational methodologies and AI in the development of selective CAIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42062761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.