ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Category specificity in holistic processing: Reciprocal face-word interference does not extend to body stimuli.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the category specificity of a previously reported reciprocal interference between holistic face and word processing by incorporating body stimuli as a control. Prior work has demonstrated that superimposed faces and words disrupt each other's holistic processing: faces are processed less holistically when paired with aligned words, and vice versa. Here, we asked whether a similar pattern of interference extends to body stimuli. In Experiment 1, we assessed whether face alignment would influence holistic body processing. We found no difference in holistic body processing between face-aligned and face-misaligned conditions, suggesting that faces do not interfere with holistic body processing. In Experiment 2, we examined whether word alignment affected body processing and again found no evidence of interference. Together, these findings indicate that body processing is unaffected by the alignment of overlaid words or faces, highlighting both the specificity and the limits of shared holistic processing mechanisms across high-level visual categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.