ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2026
BRAF Alterations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Genomic Landscape, Co-Mutation Patterns, and Clinical Relevance.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mutations of Kinases and GTPases in Cancers.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewBRAF alterations are uncommon in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), yet increasing use of broad genomic profiling has identified them as a recurrent component of MAPK-pathway dysregulation. This revised review summarizes the reported frequency, mutation spectrum, co-mutation patterns, treatment-era associations, and clinical implications of BRAF alterations in adult CLL, with explicit separation of chemoimmunotherapy-dominant cohorts from targeted-therapy-era cohorts. RECENT
findingsAcross published studies, BRAF mutations are usually detected in approximately 2-6% of unselected CLL cohorts, with higher frequencies in biologically enriched or treatment-selected populations. In chemoimmunotherapy-dominant cohorts, the clinically relevant signals are more often seen in treatment-timing endpoints such as time to first treatment, treatment-free survival, or time to next treatment than in overall survival alone. In targeted-therapy-era studies, including phase II and real-world cohorts, BRAF alterations recur as part of MAPK-pathway-driven clonal evolution at relapse after BTK-, PI3K-, or BCL2-directed therapy. Small pathology-based series also suggest that BRAF V600E is more frequent in Richter transformation than in untransformed CLL. By contrast, direct evidence for BRAF inhibitors in CLL is very limited, and available preclinical data do not support routine single-agent BRAF inhibition for the predominantly non-V600E lesions seen in CLL. Current evidence supports interpreting BRAF-mutated CLL within the broader RAS-RAF-MAPK-ERK signaling context rather than as a classical V600E-driven entity. At present, BRAF is best viewed as a biologic and resistance-relevant annotation rather than an established standalone prognostic biomarker or routine therapeutic target. Its clinical relevance appears greatest in trisomy 12-enriched disease, genomically complex cases, Richter transformation with V600E lesions, and treatment-exposed relapse where pathway-directed strategies may become increasingly important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.