ReviewImmunologic research2026
Immune cell annotation in the single-cell studies: technologies, challenges, and integrative solutions.
Review in Immunologic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing has transformed immunological research by enabling high-resolution transcriptional profiling of individual immune cells. Despite its transformative impact, annotating immune cells based solely on transcriptomic data remains challenging. These difficulties arise from biological factors, including gene expression heterogeneity and post-transcriptional regulation, as well as technical limitations that contribute to mismatches between mRNA and protein expression. Such discrepancies may lead to cell misclassification and obscure functional insights, particularly in heterogeneous populations such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells. This review highlights the major challenges in immune cell annotation by detailing the mechanisms underlying mRNA-protein discrepancies, examining both the biological factors and technical artifacts that drive this divergence, and emphasizing their implications for accurate cell classification. A critical overview of current single-cell profiling technologies follows, with evaluation of the respective advantages and limitations of transcriptomic, proteomic, and multimodal approaches. In particular, technologies such as Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing integrate transcriptomic and proteomic data, addressing the shortcomings of single-modality analyses. Further examination focuses on computational strategies for immune cell annotation, with emphasis on automated methods and bioinformatics frameworks tailored to multi-omics datasets. The unique computational challenges of integrating mRNA and protein data, together with solutions for improved annotation accuracy, are discussed. This review integrates key challenges, technologies, and computational tools, highlighting the need for standardized multimodal profiling of immune cells. Such integration enhances annotation reliability and advances disease understanding and therapy discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.